Pelvic organ prolapse is highly prevalent in women with spina bifida

Dubois A1, MALANDAIN B2, HASCOET J2, HAUDEBERT C2, BROCHARD C3, RICHARD C2, VOIRY C4, SIPROUDHIS L3, NYANGOH TIMOH K5, MANUNTA A2, SAMSON E6, PEYRONNET B2

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Neurourology

Abstract 419
Open Discussion ePosters
Scientific Open Discussion Session 102
Wednesday 7th October 2026
13:15 - 13:20 (ePoster Station 4)
Exhibition Hall
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Neuropathies: Central Retrospective Study Prolapse Symptoms Pelvic Floor
1. Urology Deparment, Rennes university Hospital, 2. Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France, 3. Department of Gastro-Enterology; University of Rennes, Rennes, France, 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Readaptation, University of Rennes, Rennes, France, 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France, 6. French referral network of Spina Bifida, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Women with spina bifida often experience neurological impairments leading to pelvic organ dysfunction, including difficulties with bladder and bowel emptying that necessitate frequent Valsalva maneuvers. These factors, combined with pelvic floor weakness, may increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of POP in women with spina bifida, identify associated risk factors, and evaluate outcomes of surgical management.
Study design, materials and methods
We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of women with spina bifida seen at a French referral center from 2007 to 2024. Age under eighteen and congenital perineal abnormality were exclusion criteria. Primary outcome was the presence of POP grade 2 or higher (Baden-Walker classification). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic POP requiring surgery, recurrence after surgery, use of vaginal pessaries, and related symptoms.
Results
POP grade ≥2 was present in 14.8% of patients. Women with POP were older (median 44 vs. 31 years; p<0.0001) and more frequently parous (58.5% vs. 18.3%; p<0.0001), although 41.5% of POP cases occurred in nulliparous women. Apical prolapse was predominant (64.3%). Among 11 patients who underwent POP surgery, 54.5% experienced recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified parity (OR 5.33; p=0.005) and lower maximum urethral closure pressure (OR 0.97; p=0.02) as independent risk factors.
Interpretation of results
Parity and low maximum urethral closure pressure, likely reflecting underlying pelvic floor weakness, may explain the particular vulnerability of this population to POP. The association between low MUCP and POP supports the hypothesis that a flaccid perineum plays a central role in the pathophysiology of prolapse in neurogenic patients, beyond the classical obstetric risk factors. The elevated recurrence rate after surgical repair could be explain by the persistence of structural risk factors such as Valsalva voiding and intrinsic pelvic floor dysfunction, which are inherently difficult to fully correct in this context. Although the potential role of ileal conduit as an additional risk factor could not be formally assessed due to limited statistical power, this association warrants further investigation. Altogether, these observations suggest that preoperative optimization of bladder and bowel management, as well as careful counseling regarding childbirth, deserve particular attention in the care of women with spina bifida.
Concluding message
POP is highly prevalent in young adult women with spina bifida, including many nulliparous patients. The parity status and a low maximum urethral closure pressure could be associated with an increased risk of POP in this population. High recurrence after surgery highlights the need for information, routine screening and tailored management in this population.
Figure 1 Table 1: patients’ characteristics
Figure 2 Table 2 : Pelvic organ prolapse characteristics
Disclosures
Funding no funding Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee This study was approved by the CNIL (Comité National Informatique et Liberté) : CNIL number: 1412467. The study was conducted following the principles of the Helsinki declaration Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Other AI Usage Grammar checking
07/06/2026 09:26:18