The development and internal validation of a prediction model for composite recurrence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery with native tissue repair

Kessels I1, van Kuijk S2, Vergeldt T3, Spaans W2, Notten K4, Weemhoff M1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract 313
POP, Incontinence and Imaging 2
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 33
Friday 9th October 2026
16:00 - 16:07
Parallel Hall 3
0.4 Brussels / 0.5 Paris
Capacity: 356
Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse Prolapse Symptoms Surgery Imaging
1. Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen, 2. Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), 3. Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, 4. Radboud University Medical Center
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
A major challenge in counseling patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is the risk of recurrence. Prediction models may support individualized counseling by estimating recurrence probability. Prediction models in urogynaecology are scarce. The existing prediction model focuses on anatomical recurrence and is not applicable to subjective or composite outcomes. The aim of this study is to develop and internally validate a multivariable prediction model estimating the risk of composite POP recurrence within one year after native tissue vaginal repair.
Study design, materials and methods
Data from three prospective multicenter cohort studies conducted in the Netherlands between 2006 and 2021 were used for the development of this prediction model. All studies included women who underwent vaginal POP surgery with anterior colporrhaphy without the use of mesh. Composite outcome was defined as anatomical recurrence beyond the hymen and/or subjective recurrence and/or retreatment (surgery or pessary) within one year postoperatively. Candidate predictors were selected based on previously identified risk factors from a validated model for anatomical recurrence, additional risk factors reported in the literature, and variables that showed univariable associations with recurrence in the present dataset. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was applied, and internal validation was performed by bootstrapping across imputed datasets to assess discrimination and calibration.
Results
A total of 533 women were included. The final model comprised five predictors: preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) stage 3 or 4 in any compartment, the levator hiatal area during Valsalva on three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound, the patient-reported preoperative burden score for prolapse, active employment status, and the Manchester Fothergill procedure (protective). After internal validation, the optimism-corrected Nagelkerke R2 was 0.12, Brier score 0.18, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 68.2%, with excellent calibration. Proposed clinical thresholds of 30% and 70% recurrence risk yielded a negative predictive value of 81.4% and a positive predictive value of 91.4%, supporting use in shared decision-making.
Interpretation of results
This study presents a simple and clinically applicable model for predicting composite POP recurrence after native tissue repair, incorporating both clinical and patient-reported factors. The model demonstrated fair discrimination and excellent calibration, offering a valuable tool for individualized risk assessment and preoperative counseling. Before clinical implementation, external validation is essential.
Concluding message
The model demonstrated fair discrimination and excellent calibration, offering a valuable tool for individualized risk assessment and preoperative counseling. Before clinical implementation, external validation is essential.
Figure 1 Prediction model
Figure 2 Model evaluation
Disclosures
Funding None. Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd The topic of this research is the development of a prediction model. The data used to develop this model were obtained from women who participated in ethically approved clinical trials. Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
Citation

Continence 19S (2026) 102790
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2026.102790

26/10/2026 11:49:48