Development and Feasibility of a Metaverse-Based Program for Health Care Transition and Quality of Life in Adolescents with Spina Bifida: A Pilot Study

Lee H1, Yun H2, Kim K1, Bae E2, Choi E3

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Paediatrics

Abstract 130
Paediatrics
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 15
Thursday 8th October 2026
11:37 - 11:45
Plenary Hall 1
Quality of Life (QoL) Pediatrics Conservative Treatment Nursing
1. College of Nursing and Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, 2. Graduate School of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea, 3. College of Nursing and Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; Yonsei Institute for Digital Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
This is the first study to develop and evaluate a metaverse-based intervention specifically designed for adolescents with spina bifida (SB). Adolescents with SB face challenges in developing self-management skills and peer relationships, both critical for healthcare transition [1]. Avatar-based interactions in the metaverse offer psychological safety and reduced stigma that may facilitate engagement in sensitive health discussions [2]. It is hypothesized that a metaverse-based program grounded in the Life Course Model would be feasible and acceptable for supporting healthcare transition among adolescents with SB. This study aimed to: (1) develop a metaverse-based healthcare transition program; and (2) evaluate its feasibility and acceptability among adolescents with SB.
Study design, materials and methods
This pilot study followed the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions, encompassing the development and feasibility phases [3]. The program was developed based on the Life Course Model, addressing three domains: self-management and health, personal and social relationships, and major life areas. Content validity was established through a seven-member expert panel, with all sessions achieving a content validity index exceeding 0.80. The intervention comprised four 60-minute weekly sessions delivered via a metaverse platform, incorporating animated educational videos on SB self-management (bladder and bowel management, mobility, healthcare systems, and sexual health), quizzes, mentorship from an undergraduate student with SB and paediatric nurse practitioners, and peer discussion activities. Eight adolescents with SB (aged 13–15 years) were recruited from a tertiary SB clinic using convenience sampling. Eligibility criteria included current middle school enrolment, ability to use digital devices, no cognitive impairments, and voluntary assent with parental consent. Feasibility was assessed using predefined criteria: ≥75% attendance, ≥80% retention, and <20% survey attrition. Acceptability was measured via a 16-item satisfaction questionnaire (10-point scale). Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires assessed self-management, transition readiness, self-efficacy, social support, sexuality knowledge, SB-related worries, career preparation, and health-related quality of life. Quantitative data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and semi-structured interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
All eight participants (mean age 14.6 years, SD = 0.7) completed the programme, achieving 100% retention and attendance, exceeding all predefined feasibility thresholds. Half had lipomyelomeningocele, 62.5% required clean intermittent catheterization, and 37.5% reported urinary and fecal incontinence. Acceptability was high, with mean satisfaction scores of 9.25/10 for the overall program and 9.13/10 for the metaverse platform. Although mean scores on all outcome measures improved, none reached statistical significance. Qualitative analysis yielded four themes: (1) barriers and adaptation in the metaverse–initial technical difficulties were quickly overcome; (2) positive affect and engagement–the avatar-based format enhanced motivation; (3) emotional support through mentorship–connecting with peers with similar conditions reduced isolation and stigma; and (4) improved understanding of SB-related challenges–participants gained greater awareness of self-management strategies, sexuality, and future planning.
Interpretation of results
The 100% retention and high satisfaction scores provide strong preliminary evidence that a metaverse-based intervention is both feasible and acceptable for adolescents with SB. Avatar-based anonymity appeared to facilitate open discussion of sensitive topics, including sexuality and self-management, which are often difficult to address in conventional clinical settings. The absence of statistically significant changes is expected given the small sample size and brief intervention.
Concluding message
Metaverse platforms represent a feasible and acceptable modality for delivering transition-related health education and psychosocial support to adolescents with SB. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating avatar-based virtual platforms as complementary tools to conventional transition services, particularly for addressing sensitive topics. Future research should evaluate efficacy in larger, multi-center randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up.
Figure 1 Implementation of the metaverse-based program in ZEP: (a) Metaverse entrance; (b) Discussion room; (c) OX quiz game; (d) Mentoring room
Figure 2 Difference in Outcome Variables Before and After the Metaverse-based Program
References
  1. Logan, L. R., Sawin, K. J., Bellin, M. H., Brei, T., & Woodward, J. (2020). Self-management and independence guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 13(4), 583-600.
  2. Rehm, I. C., Foenander, E., Wallace, K., Abbott, J. A. M., Kyrios, M., & Thomas, N. (2016). What role can avatars play in e-mental health interventions? Exploring new models of client–therapist interaction. Frontiers in psychiatry, 7, 186.
  3. Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., ... & Moore, L. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. bmj, 374.
Disclosures
Funding This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 FOUR Project, Yonsei University College of Nursing, and supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT [MSIT]) (No. 2022R1A2C1008573). The funders did not play any role in the data collection, interpretation, or reporting in this study. Clinical Trial No Subjects Human Ethics Committee This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital (Approval number 4-2024-1505) Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes AI Not at all
07/06/2026 04:32:24