Limits On Vaginal Intercourse after Mid-urEthral Sling (LOVE Trial)

Hines K1, Nguyen H2, Collins S3, Kenton K3, Geynisman-Tan J4, Russell G5, Parker-Autry C5, Matthews C5

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Abstract 277
Urogynaecology 6 - Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 24
Saturday 20th September 2025
11:00 - 11:07
Parallel Hall 3
Stress Urinary Incontinence Female Surgery
1. Virginia Beach Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2. University of Vermont, 3. University of Chicago, 4. Northwestern, 5. Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery is common for the treatment of urinary incontinence and women are typically advised to refrain from vaginal intercourse for 6 weeks. However, animal models demonstrate wound healing at 2 weeks.  The primary aim of this trial was to compare satisfaction between women counseled to refrain from intercourse for 2 weeks (early) versus 6 weeks (standard) after mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery. The secondary aims compared preference for the alternative randomization assignment, time to resumption of intercourse, and adverse events.
Study design, materials and methods
This multicentered, randomized trial enrolled sexually active women with a male partner planning isolated retropubic MUS for stress incontinence at four sites in the United States. We excluded non-English speakers, women with prior incontinence or mesh-based prolapse surgery, poorly controlled diabetes, pregnancy, history of pelvic radiation, and current smoking. Preoperatively, patients completed UDI-6 and PISQ-IR questionnaires. Patients were examined 2 weeks postoperatively, and those with intact vaginal incision were randomized to 2- or 6-week periods of restriction from vaginal penetration. Those with vaginal wound disruption on 2-week exam exited the study. Randomized patients returned 3 months postoperatively and underwent repeat pelvic examination and questionnaires. The primary outcome was satisfaction regarding ability to return to vaginal penetration, measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Postoperative day of resumption of intercourse was self-reported. At 80% power and alpha of 0.05, we needed to randomize 59 subjects to each group to detect a difference of 80% vs 54% satisfaction in the early vs. standard groups, respectively.
Results
From 4/2021 to 6/2024, 298 women were screened and 155 enrolled. Of these, 30 did not follow up at 2 weeks, and 1 exited the study for wound disruption. Therefore, 124 women were randomized, 62 to the early (2 week) and 62 to the standard (6 week) group. At baseline, there were no demographic differences, and UDI-6 and PISQ-IR results were similar (Table). At 3 months, 51 (82%) in the early versus 45 (72%) in the standard group returned for follow up. Satisfaction with return to vaginal penetration was 68% (28/41) and 65% (26/40) in the early vs. standard groups, respectively (p=0.93). The median reported day of return to intercourse was 19 (16, 26) for the early versus 43 (41, 49) for the standard group. Preference for the alternate randomization group was 12% (5/42) in the early versus 45 % (18/40) in the standard group (p=0.0012). There were 0 cases of mesh exposure and 8/39 (21%) in the early vs. 5/39 (13%) standard resumption (p=0.54) groups reported dyspareunia at 3 months. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in UDI-6 and PISQ-IR responses at 3 months with no difference between groups.
Interpretation of results
Women preferred the choice of returning to sexual activity after 2 versus 6 weeks after MUS without any negative impact on urinary incontinence results or mesh exposure.
Concluding message
Resumption of vaginal intercourse after 2 versus 6 weeks following MUS resulted in similarly high satisfaction with no adverse impact on efficacy, mesh exposure, or dyspareunia. As significantly more women preferred early resumption, surgeons should revise sexual activity restrictions to 2 weeks.
Figure 1 Table 1: Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Randomized Subjects
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial Yes Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04680897 RCT Yes Subjects Human Ethics Committee Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
06/07/2025 12:02:22