Study design, materials and methods
Materials and Methods: To obtain long-term data, all consecutive patients suffering from IOAB and treated by SNM at a single tertiary care center between December 1996 and December 2004 were included. Data regarding patient demographics, past medical, and surgical history, bladder diary, complications as well as device revision and removal rates were collected. Success was defined as an improvement > 50% of any clinical parameter.
Results
Results: Overall, 34 patients, with a median age of 57.8 years (IQR 44.8–65.7) were included. Immediately after definitive implanta- tion, 2 (6%) patients were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 9.7 years (IQR 4.7–12.0), SNM was considered successful in 20 (63%) patients. Mean amount of protections used per 24 hours significantly decreased (4.1 preoperatively vs. 1.8 at the last follow-up visit, p = 0.02). Devices were removed in 2 (6%) patients due to pain and lack of efficacy. Twenty-two revision surgeries were performed in 15 (47%) patients. First revision surgery occurred after a mean of 6.2 years (+/- 3.1). Revision surgeries were mainly performed for end of battery life/device dysfunction (n = 18,82%). No significant predictor for success was identified. Revision-free survival curve for patients implanted with a SNM device is reported on figure 1.
Interpretation of results
The main limitation of this current study may be the small sample size. It is challenging to have a similar long-term follow-up in a larger population. Indeed, European SNM nation-wide registries managed to include more patients, but their follow-ups were shorter (< 5 years) (1). A Canadian group published its 14-year SNM experience (median follow-up of 50.7 months), however the patient cohort was heterogeneous, as it included patients with bladder pain syn- drome, Urge Urinary Incontinence, and idiopathic urinary retention (2).